-
March 7th, 2002, 01:29 AM
#11
Inactive Member
Just out of curiousity is there any advantage/disadvantage of having the sender unit on the fuel rail instead of where the fuel filter is?!?!?
-
March 7th, 2002, 03:36 AM
#12
Senior Hostboard Member
Actually, there is NO advantage to mounting the sending unit there as compared to mounting it on top of the fuel filter... other than it was convenient !!!
We have in fact observed about a 5 psi difference in the readings between the gauge at the filter and the gauge in the cockpit.
-
March 8th, 2002, 03:03 PM
#13
Inactive Member
I actually read largely different fuel pressures on my filter and my rail. Unless the one on the fuel filter is screwed up. Filter guage reads 100psi rail guage reads 40 or whatever I adjust it to with FPR. My fuel filter has both in/out lines on top of the filter, I think most are now bottom top(not sure how this would make a difference though).
I also noticed you didn't mention what cam's your using, are they crower?
<font color="#a62a2a" size="1">[ March 08, 2002 11:07 AM: Message edited by: B17Vortech ]</font>
-
March 8th, 2002, 07:23 PM
#14
Inactive Member
B17,
I have stock cams. I'm not sure if anybody has made any cams that work well with the JRSC yet. The only cam swap that I have heard of that works relatively well, is swapping to a Type R exhaust cam. If you know of some that work well, let me know.
-
March 8th, 2002, 08:17 PM
#15
Inactive Member
I've heard that Crower is making some "Supercharger" cams for us!
-
March 8th, 2002, 08:45 PM
#16
Inactive Member
Jim, you had me going about this car from the last post! I thought it was a 6 PSI kit on a stock motor =). I didn't realize it was so built and running higher boost. I was about to say that makes two JRSC'ed Integras with 250+ WHP at 5.5-6 PSI. Good numbers regardless, congrats!
-
March 9th, 2002, 10:44 PM
#17
Inactive Member
Austin, this is Frank...I met you at the dyno day. I'm still working on getting those dyno runs on CD for you. School has been kicking my ass lately and I haven't had a chance.
-
March 10th, 2002, 10:20 PM
#18
Inactive Member
Good runs man. [img]graemlins/thumbs_up.gif[/img]
150ft lbs of torque at 3000 rpms is always nice.
-
March 11th, 2002, 07:28 PM
#19
Inactive Member
Yo Frank,
Hey man, good to hear from you. I totally understand school problems. Don't worry about it. I'm not in any hurry. [img]wink.gif[/img]
Strng1dah,
Thanks... and and I DO like the torque. [img]biggrin.gif[/img]
Austin
-
March 12th, 2002, 05:29 PM
#20
Inactive Member
back to the jrsc grind cams from Crower.
As of a few weeks ago, they were still in the testing phases of the cams which offer a long duration, and less lift (these are supposed to be blower friendly).
I have yet to hear anything more about them, but I'm sending an email across to their customer service department. When I hear back, I'll be sure to post.
cheers. [img]graemlins/beer.gif[/img]
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks